subscribe: Posts | Comments

Comparative Review of the Omega Seamaster Professional Model2254.50.00 VS. The Rolex Submariner 16610


Comparative Review of the Omega Seamaster Professional Model2254.50.00

VS. The Rolex Submariner 16610

By: John B. Holbrook, II June 7, 2003

One of the greatest company rivalries in horology is between Rolex and Omega. Both are well respected Swiss manufacturers of impeccable timepieces which are steeped in long histories and tradition. Each company also has their respective legion of loyal followers. So, naturally the question is often asked, “who makes the better dive watch?” Rolex? Omega? Some would say that it’s a fool’s errand to compare two different watches – each has its own merits and should be judged accordingly. However, Rolex’s Submariner and Omega’s Seamaster lend themselves well for direct comparison in both form and function In particular, the Rolex 16610 Y Series, and the Omega 2254.50.00 are models that are easily and logically compared. I will attempt to compare each watch in both relative and objective terms. Firstly, a word about the methods by which I’m using to evaluate these two watches, and my own personal biases. Firstly, I’m not weighting the categories in any way. Each category (bracelet, clasp, case, price, etc.) are an equal component of the final overall score. For some people, price, for example, is much more an important of a category than, say the clasp. Feel free to weight each of these categories with your own values to arrive at your own conclusions. Secondly, let me disclose that the Seamaster used in this article is my own, while the Submariner belongs to my good friend John Rigano. John and I hang out so much and talk watches, I practically feel like the Submariner’s mine.. although he might not quite see it that way (NOTE: I do own one Rolex – a 1970 Oyster Precision). Let me also say that both of these watches are incredible timepieces – for me to rate one higher than the other doesn’t at all mean that one or the other of these Swiss masterpieces is bad. On to the shootout! CASE Seamaster: A perfect blending of form and function – 300 meters water resistant and absolutely gorgeous. A helium release valve is built into the case, making this watch particularly useful in extended time deep dives. The case has numerous angles and curves which vary the way light strikes and is reflected from the case. Yet, there are no sharp corners and it’s completely comfortable. Of course, there’s the gorgeous Sea Monster logo on the case back. I can find no flaw with this case. RATING: 10 Submariner: A simple, yet classic design which has been often copied. This watch is also rated for 300 meters of water resistance (but lacks a helium release mechanism – this feature is found on the Rolex Sea Dweller). Some users complain of uncomfortable sharp edges on the case. Like the bracelet (see my conclusion below on the use of 904 vs. 316L grade steel) the case is constructed from 904 grade steel. RATING: 9 Winner: The Oyster style case was the birth of the diving watch, but let us not forget that Omega was a pioneer in creating a water resistant (or water proof as was designated at the time) watches. The SMP’s larger case size is a bit more impressive, as well as being more in step with the contemporary trend toward larger case sizes. The SMP wins out here in both comfort and cosmetic appeal:   SMP BEZEL Seamaster: The unidirectional bezel is about the most easily turned which I’ve ever tried. I can easily grip it, and it has nice “click” sound as you make your way around the dial. The markings on the bezel align perfectly with both the dial markers and hands, and are very legible. I find no flaws here. RATING: 10 Submariner: The unidirectional bezel is about the most easily turned which I’ve ever tried. I can easily grip it, and it has nice “click” sound as you make your way around the dial. The markings on the bezel align perfectly with both the dial markers and hands, and are very legible. I find no flaws here.  RATING: 10 Winner: Yes, my comments are identical for the bezels of both watches. Both would seem to represent the pinnacle of bezel form and function. TIE DIAL, MARKERS, & HANDS Seamaster: This has to be one of the most legible watches ever. The oversized markers and the large sword hands make for excellent visibility. The luminescent coating on the hands and markers makes this watch the undisputed king of night time glow. The wave pattern on the dial is quite captivating and distinctive. The date, while unmagnified is also easily read. RATING: 10 Submariner: The dial of the submariner is a work of art, and perhaps one of the most copied styles in watch history. The Mercedes style hands are a classic. The magnified date seems equally praised and panned – some like it, some don’t (perhaps why the Sea Dweller does not have a date magnifier).  RATING: 10 WINNER: There seems to be no observable advantage here – liking one or the other might simply be a matter of personal preference, but I like both equally well. TIE CRYSTAL Seamaster: Combines sapphire composition with an anti-reflective coating applied to the inside of the crystal for the ultimate in both scratch resistances and visibility.   RATING: 10 Submariner: Sapphire crystal used, but no anti-reflective coating is used. Some have indicated that Rolex does indeed plan to incorporate AR coating in the future, the company is notorious for being slow to change.   RATING: 9.0 WINNER: Slight edge given to the SMP because of the AR coating: SMP BRACELET Seamaster: The tapered bracelet feels extremely solid and sturdy. The polished accents on the watch are beautiful, but gives one concern about scratches. The push pin links are not easily adjusted (though not as bad as on the “Bond” bracelet). Solid end links are used, and this bracelet isn’t a hair puller.   RATING: 7.5 Submariner: The sub bracelet has changed very little over the years. Inexplicably, it has clunky, cheap feel to it. The use of screws in the links makes for easy self-sizing. Brushed finished is both attractive and scratch resistant. Rolex has quite recently (finally) begun using solid end links in the sub bracelet.   RATING: 8.5 WINNER: Tough call here – each has obvious strengths and weaknesses. The SMP feels like a higher quality bracelet. The Sub would seem to be a bit less prone to show scratches. Rolex uses a higher grade steel (904) than Omega (316L) in the bracelet. However, I can discern no functional advantage for them to do so in a watch bracelet, and 904 grade steel is approximate 3 times more expensive than 316L. My research indicates 904 grade steel is more commonly used in industrial components which under constant exposure to highly corrosive substances (acids and the like) – conditions which a watch bracelet simply will not be exposed to. Therefore, there is no appreciable benefit to the 904 grade steel in the Rolex bracelet as compared to 316L used in the Omega bracelet. Indeed, no other watch manufacturer uses 904. For ease of sizing and scratch resistance though, this category belongs to Rolex:   SUB CLASP Seamaster: Two-button deployment clasp with integrated diver suit extension. The clasp is easily opened and closed, yet feels extremely sturdy. The diver extension is also easily deployed. The clasp has an extremely high quality feel, and is the best bracelet clasp I have ever used. The large amount of smooth surface area on the bottom of the clasp is reputedly scratch- prone. The clasp also lacks a fine adjustment pin (the bracelet includes a half-sized link for sizing purposes) which some feel detracts from the comfort of the overall bracelet.   RATING: 8.5 Submariner: The clasp is easily the weakest point on the entire watch. The flip lock clap has been used on Rolex watches for years, and functionally is quite secure. However, the flimsy, thin, stamped sheet metal used in the clasp is simply unacceptable given the price of the watch. Many users (including my friend John who owns this Submariner) report the divers extension is difficult to use. Yes, the clasp does the simple job it was designed to do. No, Rolex has absolutely no motivation to do anything differently based on the sales success.   RATING: 7.0 WINNER: No contest here – the Omega clasp is superior in both form and function.   SMP MOVEMENT Seamaster: The Omega 1120 is a 23 jewel COSC certified movement. Based on the ETA 2892-A2, Omega heavily modifies the 21 jewel base ebauche to produce the beautifully decorated, chronometer grade movement which is the cal. 1120.   RATING: 7.0 Submariner: The Rolex 3135 movement is a 31 jewel COSC certified, in-house movement that’s been a workhorse for Rolex for many years. The 3135 may not be the prettiest movement you’ll ever see, but it does the job it was designed to do exceedingly well.   RATING: 8.0 WINNER: I’ve thought about this one long and hard. I’ve reviewed the available literature and research on the Rolex 3135 as well as the Omega 1120. Both are rock solid, dependable COSC certified movements. The Rolex 3135 does have some advantages. For instance, the 3135 does have a longer power reserve 50 hrs. vs. 44 hrs. for the 1120. Additionally, the 3135 has technically been in existence longer than the 1120. That means Rolex has had longer to refine the production of the 3135 vs. the 1120, and there’s likely more spare 3135 parts out there as compared to the 1120. But consider that the 1120 is based on the ETA 2892-A2 – a moment that was introduced in 1975, with a development history going back years earlier to Eterna. This means the 1120 has a lot more going for it in terms of service history and spare parts then one might initially conclude. The nod ultimately goes to the Submariner.   SUB. PACKAGING Seamaster: Gorgeous red leather box, hardcover manual, and leather wallet for the warranty card, chronometer certification, and manual key (pictogram card).   RATING: 8 Submariner: Classic green leather box, manuals/warranty/chronometer certification, and the infamous silver anchor.   RATING: 8 WINNER: Both have very nice packaging, though for the money you pay for each, a nice wood exterior presentation box would be a nice touch (as is the case with the Rolex Daytona, and the Omega Aqua Terra). TIE PRESTIGE Seamaster: Omega is an extremely well known, well respected brand, both within and outside watch enthusiast circles. Omega estimates their own brand recognition to be 70% world wide (7 out of every 10 people have heard of Omega watches). Omega marketing works hard to maintain and increase this recognition, and to associate the brand with celebrities and activities which suggest success and achievement.   RATING: 8. Submariner: Rolex may well be the prestige standard by which all other watch brands are measured. Rolex is unequaled in their marketing efforts. Even people who know virtually nothing about watches recognize the Rolex name and associate with it being “the best.” No other watch is a greater, more recognizable symbol of status and achievement.    RATING: 10 Winner: Rolex is the hands down winner of this category. In fact, many people buy Rolex watches on this basis alone.   SUB PRICE Seamaster: $1750.00 retail is a lot of money, but the “street” price of this watch can typically see a 30-35% discount off the retail price. When compared to watches in a similar category, the price, at both retail and especially street level, is a relative bargain. Since the current version of the Seamaster has been around less than 10 yrs., long term pricing trends are inconclusive. Well maintained, vintage Omega Seamaster models hold and in some cases appreciate in value. Well maintained current model Seamasters seem to be holding roughly 50% of their retail value at this point. So, one can conclude that if a current model Seamaster is purchased either used or new at street price levels, then one stands to loose very little, if any of the purchase price if the watch is later sold.   RATING: 8 Submariner: Three factors contribute to the current retail pricing and future value of Rolex watches. The Rolex policy of continuously, and regularly increasing the retail price is why the Submariner is currently reaching nearly $4000.00. Rolex is tyrannical when it comes to discounting, so it’s rare to see a Rolex discounted any more than 10%, if at all. Additionally, Rolex controls production to ensure supply does not exceed demand. Obviously the closer to actual retail price one pays for a Submariner, the longer one will have to hold on to the watch without experiencing a loss when reselling (the asking price of a used Rolex seems to increase in direct proportion to the escalating retail price). But, one does have a better than fair chance of recouping their investment or even making some money if they sell their submariner in the future. There is no empirical reason for the high price of the Submariner, yet Rolex sells every watch they make so they have no reason to alter their pricing policy.   RATING: 6 Winner: The SMP is the hands down winner here. You can purchase 2 SMPs for the price of a Sub, and have money left over.    SMP.


TOTAL POINTS POSSIBLE: 100 SEAMASTER TOTAL POINTS: 87 SUBMARINER TOTAL POINTS: 85.5 TOTAL NUMBER OF CATEGORIES: 10 TOTAL CATEGORIES TIED: 2 TOTAL CATEGORIES SEAMASTER: 4 TOTAL CATEGORIES SUBMARINER: 4 Given that I purchased the Seamaster and not the Submariner, I recognize a degree of inherit bias on my part in evaluating these two watches.   However, no one was more surprised than me at how closely these two scored.   Only a point and a half separate the Seamaster from the Submariner, with the SMP getting the highest overall score. Interestingly enough, in my research for this article, I learned that WatchTime Magazine did a very similar comparison of a titanium Omega Seamaster with a Rolex Submariner in their May/June 2000 issue. The results were very similar – a marginal win, but for the Submariner (solace for those who will undoubtedly be outraged at the notion that anyone would rate Omega higher than Rolex) with a score of 80 to 76. This experience in doing this article was valuable beyond words. Researching the two companies and these two particular models (each with their own great history and tradition) was truly enriching.   My appreciation for both the Seamaster and the Submariner has only grown. Hopefully, yours has as well.

You can discuss this article in the Omega Forum of my online luxury watch discussion forum community WATCH TALK FORUMS. *All text and images contained in this review are the original work of the author, John B. Holbrook, II and are copyright protected. Use of any of the information or images without the permission of the author is prohibited.

Bookmark, Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • Facebook
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Twitter
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Add to favorites
  1. Denis LUCET says:

    Dear John:
    I really appreciated reading your comparative rebord bette Omega’s Seamaster and Rolex’s Submariner ( Nice typo and mixtures).
    Actually, I am already The owner of a couple of “luxury” watches (Chopard’s Mille Miglia, Maurice Lacroix’s rétrograde masterpiece, …) and for my next Watch, I would like to go for a diving one.
    I am really fond of the look of the Seamaster and I am probable likely to go for one but I am a little bit post with the différent references I have came across regarding the Seamaster.
    As I now consider you as an expert in tSeamaster

  2. Denis Lucet says:

    Dear John, I really much enjoyed reading your review between Omega’s Seamaster and Rolex’s Submariner (good writing and very nice pictures!) I already own a couple of “luxury” watches (Chopard, Baum & Mercier, Maurice Lacroix) and I feel that for my next watch I would like to go to a diving one. I am really fond of the Seamaster but I am a little bit confused with the different references I

  3. Denis Lucet says:

    with the different references I came across. As I consider you as an expert in the field, could you please help me to choose my next Seamaster? By the way, can you confirm that Omega is going to discontinue this model?
    Thanks in advance. Denis.

  4. John B. Holbrook, II says:

    Dennis – join me and other Omega fans in the Omega Forum on WATCH TALK FORUMS. You can tell us what you like and we’ll help you find a Seamaster that’s right for you!

  5. i like SEAMASTER very much!

  6. ark Shuttleworth says:

    Great article and a great site.
    I always wanted a Rolex Submariner, but could never justify the price. I ended up buying an Omega Seamaster(two actually)and now I find I actually prefer it to my friends Submariner. Taking into consideration looks, quality and the price tag, the Seamaster is a bargain. I cannot fault it. I love my Seamaster.

  7. As the owner of both a Rolex Submariner and an Omega Seamaster Professional, I have to agree with your assessment. I am “fond” of my Submariner but I LOVE my Omegas!…..I also own a Planet Ocean as well.

  8. Thank you for making this comparison. I’m currently shopping for a SMP and was also considering a pre-owned SUB. You have saved me both time and money.


  9. The other thing which has been missed about these two comparisons is that if you wear the Rolex you always get people asking if its genuine or fake, a question that dosent arise when wearing an Omega !!

  10. Dean – that’s true, but on the flip side of that coin, hardly anyone outside of watch enthusiasts will recognize and make any comment on an Omega. 🙁

  11. Good Article John!

    I have been a Seamaster “collector” for quite some time now and I probably own eight or more at present. I’ve always been impressed with the sturdiness and style that they portray. I have my late father’s service watch, a gold Semaster from 1965, a few 120M models, 4 “Bond” 2531.80 models, all of course, automatic. Most recently I even picked up a co-axial 300M just because. The most favorite of all happens to be my 2254.50. The very watch that you chose to do your comparison with.


  12. Thanks Ray! PLEASE visit my watch discussion site WATCH TALK FORUMS at Myself and the other Seamaster fans in the Omega forum would love to see some photos from your collection. 🙂

  13. A great article! I have been the proud owner of an Omega Seamaster 2254.50.00 for some years now. I can’t think of a more handsome, sturdy, functional watch than this one! It would be a shame if (as I believe it has) been discontinued. thank you for your article, it doesn’t surprise me at all that the Seamaster comes out on top.

  14. Thanks for the kind words Andrew! 🙂

    I’m sure the guys over in the Omega forum at WATCH TALK FORUMS would love to see some pics of the 2254! Head on over!

  15. I prefer the Omega, I own a Seamaster 300M automatic, ceramic bezel in black, skeletal hands,
    and I love it. My first high end watch, other than the 1943 Longines I inherited from my grandfather.

  16. Fine comparison. I would say it is a tigh. Both watches are great, none is cleary better than the other. The difference in price is only due to the somewhat bigger name of Rolex and by now that is history, too. Modern Omega 300 and Omega PO do not cost considerably less than modern Rolex watches any more, at least we do not speak about a factor of more than two.

    What is funny to notice is that the 2254 keeps its price not only astonishingly well but that it gets more and more expensive with every year. I own a 2254 and a 2234 (a 2254 with GMT function) and both are gorgeous. By now the cost considerably more on the used market then when they were new.

    This is probably due to the fact that Omega, when they discontinued these models, discontinued the sword hand design completely and by now also has no watch with the wave pattern left. In addition you cannot get the SMPs any more on this beautifull, simple bracelets but only on the Bond style bracelets that are much more shiny but not more beautifull in my opinion. The 2254 and 2234 are the last watches of an era and that makes them so loveable by many collectors.

    I will continue to wear them constantly.

    I also would love to have a Rolex Submariner yet I cannot really justify the expenses, after all I already own two great watches that are rated as watertight up to 300m and are certified chronometers. A third watch of this type would be overkill. If on the other hand I had only one Seamaster, be it 2254 or 2234, I probably now would buy a Rolex.

    But it would not be this 16610 and also not the current ceramic model. I dislike the new models with ther fat lugs a lot. I also hate the date magnifier. I know that it has a lot of tradition, that Rolex builds its watches like this since decades, and real die-hard fans will kill me for heresy when I say now: I hate the magnifier, it is among the most ugly things I can imagine on a otherwise really beautifull watch. I do not really need it, usually I know the date and if I am in doubt I look at my mobile anyhow, for I usually forget to readjust the date after a 28/29/30 day month so I just do not trust the date on a hand watch for I also will never remember if I readjusted it or not.

    So if I would go for a Rolex, it would be the no-date Submariner 14060, one of the two really beautiful watches Rolex has built in the last 20 years. The other would be the Explorer 1.

    Maybe I go for an Explorer 1 some time in the future.

  17. Thank you for your thoughts on the article!


  1. Omega Seamaster Professional or Tag Carrera? - [...] Does anyone have the link to this review? I've been looking around but cant find it.…
  2. Need advice - Omega Seamaster vs Rolex Submariner? - [...] Seamaster vs Rolex Submariner? Here's a comparison with older models of the Sub and Seamaster:…
  3. Best mainstream 3 hand diver for $1500? - [...] 3 hand diver for $1500? I would go for the Omega 2254, a classic and…
  4. Anonymous - [...] links com boas comparativas/reviews : Comparative Review of the Omega Seamaster Professional Model2254.50.00 VS. The Rolex Submariner 1661...…
  5. Anonymous - [...] Dejo vos ainda un belo comparativo de uno de estos vs un Sub 16610: Um [...]
  6. What is the draw to ROLEX? - Page 17 - [...] My Omega Seamaster 300M, Automatic, Ceramic Bezel, I spent $2800 vs. Rolex Submariner…

Leave a Reply

%d bloggers like this: